A Dummies Guide to: Public Health in the Industrial Revolution

What is Public Health?

Public Health are things that a government does to try and ensure that things are clean and healthy for the public. Things like providing sewers, clean water etc.

When was the Industrial Revolution?

Most of the events that I’ll be talking about here happened in the 19th century. Industrialisation started a little earlier than this, in the mid 18th century.

What was the problem?

Industrialisation led to a really rapid change in the way that people lived and worked. As factories developed people rushed into towns to get jobs in them. A lot of the housing that was provided had been built quickly and without enough consideration of things like cleanliness, removal of human waste, provision of clean water, education of access to a healthy diet. As these areas grew in size, the problem got worse. These areas, slums as they are known, were rife for the spread of infectious diseases and life expectancy in some of them fell as low as 11 or 12!

How did they solve the problem?

It took a while for much to be done. In the 1830’s there was a review of the Poor Law which led to some changes in the way that por relief was given out but it was quite limited. As diseases like Cholera and Typhoid hit different parts of the country in that decade there were a series of local reports produced about health. It started to become clear (to some!) that something needed to be done to ensure that there were minimum conditions. This belief was reenforced by edwin Chadwick’s report on Health, which painted a pretty bad picture of conditions for the people living in poorer areas. The people who felt like this formed the Health of Towns Association which acted as a pressure group trying to persuade government and local councils to take action. As a result the government passed a Public Health act in 1848. Improvements were limited though in many places and Cholera once again returned and ravaged parts of the country. Despite the work of John Snow little was done to improve conditions until after the second reform act, when ordinary men were given the vote. This now made Public Health a real political issue - it was a vote winner! Soon afterwards there was a Royal Sanitary Commission established (1869) and its findings led to a Second Public Health Act (1872). This act placed responsibility for health on local authorities. As the implications of Pasteur’s Germ Theory became more widely understood it was clear that further action was needed - as some authorities had done little. A 3rd Public Health Act was introduced in 1875 which made the requirements very clear. This act was followed by lots of legislation about all sorts of health and building issues. In the twentieth century these pieces of legislation were followed up with slum clearances (they’d stopped slums being built but hadn’t ordered existing ones to be knocked down in the 19th century) and work was done on improving the health of children. The Liberal Reforms of the early 20th century and later introduction of the Welfare State are more recent examples of Public Health initiatives.

Why did it take so long to solve the problem?

Remember: CAFE

Cost - who was going to pay for the huge amount of work needed?
Attitude - people should learn to help themselves (called a Laissez Faire approach)
Fear - what will the working classes want next?
Evidence - is there any proof that the spending will improve things? until Germ Theory, there wasn’t any…

A Dummies Guide to: The Revolution in Surgery

What was the revolution in surgery?

The term ‘revolution in surgery’ is used to describe a period of time when a series of breakthroughs led to surgery becoming cleaner, relatively pain free and much safer. Before this period surgery was quick, dirty and dangerous with patients having a large death rate due to blood loss, pain and infection. After the revolution in surgery each of these issues was minimised.

What period of time are we talking about?

Really open to interpretation here as some would argue that we’re still in this period. Here, I’m talking about surgery from about 1750 to about 1900.

What was surgery like before this period?

In simple terms: it was QUICK (it had to be to prevent blood loss); DIRTY (because people weren’t aware of the causes of infection) and PAINFUL (because there were few effective painkillers). Each of these three problems combine to make it very dangerous - though it was sometimes successful!

How was the problem of pain overcome?

Throughout time people have tried to overcome the problem of pain during surgery. They used things ranging from alchohol to hemlock to try and numb the pain, but numbing it was all that it really did. In the 19th century surgeons made some huge advances. Through experimentation they developed anaesthetics that meant that surgery became much less painful. Early attempts were the use of carbon dioxide (1820’s) and nitrous oxide (laughing gas) in 1846. Both had some pain relieving qualities but weren’t highly successful. Around the same time Crawford Long secretly made use of Ether on a patient. The same anaesthetic was then used by William Morton in 1846. News of his successful use of Ether led to it being tried by surgeons around the world. Ether had drawbacks though - patients sometimes vomitted as a result of being given it and it was highly flammable. The use of Ether was largely replaced by the use of Chloroform in the UK. This was first used by James Simpson in 1847 and became popular after it was made known that Queen Victoria had used it as a painkiller during childbirth.

Use of these painkilling anaesthetics developed. Local anaesthetics were introduced in 1877 and in the 20th century ways of inducing sleep and relaxing muscles were discovered.

How was the problem of blood loss overcome?

Surgeons had always known that loss of blood was a real problem and attempts had been made to replace it for some time. For example, in the 15th century Pope Innocent VIII had blood from 3 young boys infused into his body (basically pured down his mouth). It didn’t work - but the notion of transfusion was clearly recognised by some at that time. Experiments on animals and several humans took place throughout the 16th and 17th centuries with small amounts of blood from animals successfully being infused into several humans. All attempts to place large amounts of blood into people failed though. The first successful transfusion was in 1818 when James Blundell extracted 4 ounces of blood from his arm and successfully transfused it into his wife. Between 1825 and 1830 he carried out a further 10 transfusions and in 1840 he was part of the team who performed the first whole blood transfusion.

Even though they had worked out how to replace blood during surgery many patients still died. This was because the wrong kind of blood was often used. In 1901 Karl Landsteiner discovered blood groups. After this, surgeons could match blood groups and reduce the risk of there being a fatal reaction / rejection of the blood.

This just left the problem of having enough blood available. This problem has largely been solved through the development of blood banks and improved storage methods that have been developed over the past 100 years.

How was the problem of infection overcome?

The ultimate frustration for surgeons must have been to successfully operate, reduce blood loss and make sure that pain didn’t overcome the patient, only to see them die a few days later from an infection. Of course until Germ Theory was developed and accepted, surgeons weren’t sure what caused these infections and so they could only guess at what to do to limit the risk. One of the first to do so successfuly was Ignaz Semmelweiss. He insisted on cleanliness and had much better survival rates than other surgeons doing similar work - but he wasn’t able to convince others to do the same. The breakthrough came in 1867. Joseph Lister was a surgeon in Glasgow. He read about Germ Theory and realised that this was connected to the infections he saw. When he heard about a spray being used in sewers to reduce the risk of disease he decided to investigate. He quickly came to the conclusion that using Carbolic Acid to clean wounds and bandages would significantly reduce infections. His ideas were adopted by the German army in the Franco-Prussian war and the positive outcome helped to convince people that his methods were effective. Following this, Robert Koch worked on sterilisation of surgical equipment, which led to further improvements. This ‘big idea’ is antiseptic surgery - and antiseptics are still widely used today. These ideas have been developed so that nowadays not only are the bandages, wounds and equipment clean, so is the air! Modern operating theatres have filtered air streams and are ‘asceptic’ (ie totally clean).

Did everyone approve of the changes?

Some of these developments encountered lots of opposition. becase some of them were quite experimental they didn’t always work. This cast doubt over the merits of the ideas and until scientists ‘got it right’ there were many who doubted them. There are also moral and religious objections to some of these ideas, for example, Blood Transfusion.

A Dummies Guide to Medicine in the Renaissance

What’s Renaissance and when was it?

Renaissance means re-birth. Its a period of time when lots of old ideas were challenged. When did it happen? Roughly the 14th to 17th centuries (AD).

What happened?

The churches power and authority were challenged! This might not seem to make much difference to medicine - but it did! Because the church had done most of the teaching about health, it had been hard to look for new ways of treating illnesses, or to explore the workings of the body. To do so could have been been seen as being anti-god (heresy). People who were thought of like that tended to get executed - so naturally people didn’t challenge the church often!

How did this affect medicine?

It meant that people were more willing to challenge the work of people like Galen, and also that they might be more willing to break some of the rules of the church. For example, dissection was still banned but now the authority of the church was questioned some anatomists were willing to take a risk and started dissecting. Results? Knowledge of the anatomy improved quite dramatically. Andreas Vesalius was able to produce a very detailed set of drawing of the human body and Wiliam Harvey discovered that blood circulated around the body: both were massive breakthroughs.

Massive breakthroughs? How did this help people at the time?

Heres the catch. People like Vesalius and Harvey made massive improvements to our knowledge about the way that the body worked and were able to spread their ideas quickly because of the printing press. However, neither of them knew what caused diseases so their findings were impressive but of little immediate use to doctors or patients. The area where there were breakthroughs that had an immediate and lasting effect on treatments was in the field of Surgery. Here a chance discovery in a battlefield hospital led to a massive improvement in the way that wounds were teated. A French surgeon, Pare, found that lotions he had concocted out of desperation, worked! He went on to gain a lot of support from the French monarchy and made several other breakthroughs - the use of ligatures, for example.

So, there were lots of new ideas - what about treatments?

Much the same as in earlier periods of time. Most people were still reliant on family members or trusted elders. There were an increasing number of trained doctors but they remained expensive. After the dissolution of the monasteries in the UK, there was also fewer places for the poor to go to receive help, though there were some more hospitals built. The doctors of King Charles II recorded the medicines they gave him in his dying days. They remained a combination of natural and supernatural attempts to tackle disease.

And Public Health, did that change?

Not particularly. There were some localised rules about waste and so on but in general investment was quite limited as other things remained more important to our rulers. The most significant chang in the UK came after the Great Plague and Fire of London. When the city was rebuilt, it was done so in a much more open and clean manner.

So did things get better during this period?

On a day to day basis for ordinary people with common ailments, probably not much. Scientists now had a lot more knowledge though, medicine was on the brink of being able to make massive leaps forward.

A Dummies Guide to Medieval Medicine

When was the Medieval period?

Different people put different dates on periods. For this post I’m talking about the period between the fall of Rome through to roughly 1450. Note - some medicine through time courses start in 1350…

What happened when the Roman Empire collapsed?

When the Romans left, so did much of the organisation and investment. In many areas the fall of Rome was quite violent and much was destroyed. This included books and some of the buildings that helped with Public Health. For a long time afterwards there was relatively little spent on Public Health as it was expensive and the money wasn’t availabe because it was often being spent on war. This led to some elements of medicine and health going backwards (regression).

Did everything get worse?

No. People still had access to wisewomen, herbal remedies and could turn to religion or the church for help. Richer people could still pay to see a doctor and there were still surgeons of varying levels of skill. For an ordinary person living in Britain, healthcare would have been little different - the noticeable change would have been the reduced number of trained doctors / surgeons. So whilst there were periods of chaos and war and a lack of learning about medicine, on a day to day level for ‘normal’ people things were little different in terms of medical practices.

What ideas stayed the same?

People still used common sense cures, went to family members for advice and used herbal remedies. There was also continued belief in supernatural causes of disease. A good example of the varied beliefs are the measures taken to try and prevent the Black Death spreading. This ranged from people whipping themselves to try and punish themselves for being sinners (they thought god was punishing them by sending the Plague) to quarantine being introduced in places. Charms, crosses and prayer were used by some, others linked it to bad smells and tried to clean the air. (Many tried a combination of these).

Did anything get better?

Lots of people make the mistake of thinking that things either got worse or just stayed the same in the Middle Ages. Thats not entirely true. As the church became more powerful there were increased numbers of monasteries. These provided infirmaries and helped the poor. The church also helped spread ideas and was largely responsible for the reintroduction of the ideas of people like Galen. Universities began to be built and there were some hospitals built.

What about breakthroughs and big ideas?

There wasn’t a ‘huge’ breakthrough or development in this period (in Europe at least), which is why some people think nothing got better. There were ‘little’ breakthroughs though! Theodoric of Lucca found out that it was best to drain pus from a wound and hemlock was being used to kill pain. Some of the new ideas being developed in the Islamic world started to spread into Europe as well (See this page for a brief introduction to Islamic Medicine).

A Dummies Guide to Medicine in the Roman Empire

When was Ancient Rome?

Historians believe Rome was founded in 753BC. It grew from being a small kingdom into a large Republic. From the first century BC until the fifth century AD, Rome had a large empire - and its the spread of Roman ideas around this empire that we’re interested in!

How was Ancient Rome organised?
For the purposes of this post, we’ll look at the Empire. Unlike the Greek civilisation the Romans were quite rigid in their organisation. At the top of the pile was the Emperor and beneath him the senate. The members of the senate were elected by citizens of Rome. Around the Empire control would be handed to a governor. He often had a large military force at his disposal to ensure law and order. In Briton some areas retained their old rulers, who acted as tenant kings and governed locally under Roman supervision. In areas where there had been lots of opposition, Roman rule was direct and enforced by the Roman army.

What was Roman Culture like then?
The Romans were pragmatic and borrowed ideas from many of the areas that they conquered or controlled. This meant that a lot of Greek ideas were widely accepted by Romans, as were religions and ideas from elsewhere in the empire. The Romans also enjoyed gladiatorial games and chariot racing. In general though the Romans weren’t as big a set of ‘thinkers’ as the Greeks, they tended to be more focussed on the practical side of things and ‘got on with it.’

How did this influence medicine?
On a simple level the Empire results in the spread of ideas and practices from as far apart as the North of England to Palestine, Egypt and into Persia. Roman values also meant that they took their own way of life with them: this meant that their liking for baths, for example, spread quite quickly. The Gladiatorial games gave surgeons loads of opportunities to look at different kinds of wounds and the importance of the army meant that there were lots of hospitals, surgeons and roads - all of which help to improve health.

Did the Romans create anything new then, or was it just a lot of borrowed ideas?

They certainly borrowed a lot - supernatural ideas continued, for example - but they also created a lot as well. The two ‘big’ things that this period is best known for are a person and an idea. The person was Galen, the idea: Public Health.

Whats Galen important for then?
Galen wrote LOADS. He came up with lots of new ideas about how the body worked and developed the ideas of people like Hippocrates. His real claim to fame is that his ideas were accepted for so long - all the way into the Renaissance! He wasn’t always right - Vesalius later corrects some of his more glaring errors - but he provided fairly sound advise on all types of illness / surgical need and, as doctor to the Emperor, had the clout to get his message heard!

Whats important about Public Health?
Nowadays we’re reminded that ‘coughs and sneezes spread diseases.’ They do… but infected water does a pretty nasty job of spreading disease too! The Romans brought clean water into towns and cities using Aqueducts and took dirty water away using Sewers. They also invested in public toilets and bathhouses. Whilst they didn’t know it, in doing so they were limiting the number of germs that could be spread through the water supply. Result? Healthier towns and cities - though don’t for a second think that this means that all Roman towns were clean and disease free as that wasnt the case!

A Dummies Guide to Medicine in Ancient Greece

A Dummies guide to medicine in Ancient Greece

When was Ancient Greece?

Ancient Greece emerged from about 800BC and lasted until it was subsumed into the Roman Empire in 148 AD. Even after this date Greek culture was strong.

How was Ancient Greece organised?

Unlike Egypt, Ancient Greece was not one kingdom. Greece was a collection of independent city-states. These city states had their own leaders and government. What they shared was a common culture, though this didn’t stop them falling out and fighting!

What was Greek Culture like then?

The Greeks are renowned for having been great thinkers. Philosophy prospered in these city states as people developed new ideas and looked to explain them. This led to many people thinking of ways in which the human body worked and of reasons for the illnesses and diseases that plagued the Ancient World.

The Greeks also communicated with people from other civilisations and were open to new ideas. They were aware of the beliefs of the Ancient Egyptians and took on board many of the natural elements of the Egyptian culture.

Who were these philosophers and what did they achieve?

There were many Greek philosophers. The most significant ones for this course were Hippocrates and Aristotle.

Aristotle was born in 384 BC. He developed a theory that linked the seasons to different symptoms of disease. Using natural beliefs he developed these links into a theory based on liquids in the body and the way that they balanced. This theory became known as the theory of the four humors.

Hippocrates based many of his ideas on the work that Aristotle had conducted. He developed his theory of the four humours and made the links between the seasons, fluids and imbalances very clear. This led to the development of theories about how to treat disease.

Hippocrates’ contribution to Medicine is immense. He wrote hundreds of articles about health, known collectively as the Hippocratic Corpus and is remembered now as being ‘The Father of Medicine’. Perhaps the biggest contribution he made was the development of something called Clinical Observation. Here he devised a system for doctors to follow when a patient visited them. He encouraged careful observation of the patient and the way that an illness progressed. This would lead to an understanding of the ways in which an illness should be treated and a more effective diagnosis and treatment being made.

What about Religion, did they just forget about it?

Not all Greeks were philosophers, nor did everyone look for a natural cause of disease. Many people remained very spiritual in their beliefs about the cause of disease. One of the best examples of this continued belief is the Cult of Asclepios.

Asclepios was a Greek god of health. People believed that diseases were sent by him and that in order to cure themselves they needed to pray to him and worship him. To do this they visited temples dedicated to his name. At these temples a number of rituals would take place. Many of these are now known to be good for improving the health of people: for example, they washed and bathed prior to praying, they ate healthily and used soothing lotions and relaxing methods to alleviate pain. Whilst these were often done to please the god, it shows that natural forms of medicine were being adopted alongside supernatural forms of medicine to treat people.

Asclepions were extremely popular. Several huge temple complexes were built throughout Greece and the cult spread as far as Rome at the height of the Roman Empire.

A Dummies Guide to Medicine in Ancient Egypt

A Dummies guide to medicine in Ancient Egypt

When was Ancient Egypt?

The Ancient Egyptian civilisation was in existence from approximately 3000BC to 400AD. In reality the era is a number of different periods in Egyptian history, when different families (dynasties) ruled Egypt.

How was Society different to prehistoric times?

The Egyptians developed a system of writing things down. They used hieroglyphics to record their findings. They also lived in organised, permanent settlements and built towns and cities. Unlike prehistoric man, the Egyptians had also a system of law and order based on a system of government led by a ruling Pharaoh.

Other than writing, what advances were made in the Egyptian period?

The Egyptian period was very long so lots changed over the course of the era. The Egyptians developed a complicated set of religious beliefs and rituals, many of which related to medicine and the human body. They also became expert builders and engineers, building the great pyramids, temples and roads.

Religious beliefs? How do they affect medicine?

The Egyptians believed that life on earth was part of a cycle. Once a person died their spirit passed into the afterlife. The quality of the afterlife would be improved if the person’s remains were treated in certain ways. This meant that Egyptian doctors couldn’t dissect bodies as they had to remain intact for the afterlife. However the process of preserving the body, mummification, did mean that some knowledge of the human anatomy was acquired.

So, religion just prevented them from cutting up bodies?

No. Religious beliefs also required cleanliness in temples which had a knock on effect of improving health. Religion also meant that prayer was used extensively by doctors as their beliefs led them to require doctors to ask the gods for forgiveness and mercy. This belief in gods causing and sending disease meant that doctors would not look for alternative causes of illnesses.

What about surgery?

The Egyptians observed that water from the River Nile could become blocked in irrigation channels. They used this simple observation to establish that blockages in the veins could be removed in much the same way as a blocked channel was opened up. Based on these observations they began performing operations to remove cists and abscesses.

How would they try and cure illnesses then?

A combination of natural and supernatural cures was used. These were based on their beliefs about the cause of disease and an element of trial and error. Herbal remedies were used to help cure things such as stomach pains. Combinations of natural elements could be used to induce vomiting for example. These were often prescribed alongside a prayer though, as the disease was thought to have been sent by the gods. Sometimes the illness would simply be treated with a prescribed prayer.

Examples:

The following are all taken from the Papyrus Ebers, an Egyptian scroll that Doctors had to use when treating a patient.

Cure for Cataracts:
Mix brain-of-tortoise with honey. Place on the eye and say:
There is a shouting in the southern sky in darkness, There is an uproar in the northern sky, The Hall of Pillars falls into the waters. The crew of the sun god bent their oars so that the heads at his side fall into the water, Who leads hither what he finds? I lead forth what I find. I lead forth your heads. I lift up your necks. I fasten what has been cut from you in its place. I lead you forth to drive away the god of Fevers and all possible deadly arts.
Cure for Burns:
Create a mixture of milk of a woman who has borne a male child, gum, and, ram’s hair. While administering this mixture say: Thy son Horus is burnt in the desert. Is there any water there? There is no water. I have water in my mouth and a Nile between my thighs. I have come to extinguish the fire.
Head Wounds
If thou examines a man having a gaping wound in his head penetrating to the bone, smashing his skull, and rending open the brain of his skull, thou shouldst palpate his wound. Shouldst thou find that smash which in his skull like those corrugations which form in molten copper, and something therein throbbing and fluttering under thy fingers, like the weak place of an infant’s crown before it becomes whole- when it has happened there is no throbbing and fluttering under thy fingers until the brain of his skull is rent open and he discharges blood from both his nostrils, and he suffers with stiffness in his neck.

Feel free to ask questions or add further info by submitting comments. Dummies guides to each period will be added in chronological order.

Interactive Scheme of Work

The task noted in my previous post has now been completed. An interactive scheme of work for medicine through time, based largely on the edexcel specification, is now complete. Covering 23 enquiries the scheme provides activities for pupils to complete which will enable them to gain a good understanding of the key concepts covered in their examinations. Whilst the scheme if focussed on the Edexcel specification there are plenty of overlaps with the specifications from other exam boards and I hope that users will find the resources adaptable enough to transfer to these courses. I won’t pretend that all of the ideas are my own, they’re not! I’ve made use of existing resources from trusted colleagues and reputable sites wherever they already cater for the required outcomes. The scheme will no doubt be tinkered with over time (the first 4 units in particular will be revisited) and any feedback would be appreciated.

Interactive Scheme of Work.

Lessons for the Edexcel syllabus

I’ve uploaded the first batch of notes, resources and lessons for the Edexcel medicine through time syllabus.

These vary in the amount of detail at the moment - earlier topics tend to simply be notes, whereas issues that I’ve taught recently or am about to teach are closer to online lessons.

Each of the lessons makes use of the suggestions in the EdExcel scheme of work. Where practical I have broken down their suggested activities into bite sized chunks and formatted it in a way that I think / hope my own students will be able to access. The suggestions on the Edexcel site have been complemented through links to videos on the BBC Class Clips website and through a few interactivities.

The remaining lessons will be added as I plan lessons this year and this initial batch of resources will be returned to and improved over time. Please post a comment if you have any suggestions, resources or links that will help improve any of these pages.

The list of topics covered, and of topics that will be covered at a later date, can be found here. Note - these will be linked to from the main part of the site when all of the lessons have been completed and activities incorporated in most if not all of the lesson pages. They are posted here to get some initial feedback and to share resources as they are completed in draft format.

Videos about medicine through time

I’ve put together a list of useful videos that are available via youtube on this page of the site.

At the moment theres fairly good coverage of the course contents but I’m sure other people will have come across ones that I’ve not linked to. If so, please add a comment here or contact me via twitter - @medthrutime




Polls

Which period of time was the worst in which to have an infection?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...